Noida: Sector 51 Guest House From where 18 people, including eight managers, were arrested earlier this week for their alleged involvement in gender The racket belongs to a company that has links with a controversial BJP MLA From the Kanpur countryside, TOI has learned.
The three-storey building (B-52) is owned by AVP Buildtech Pvt Ltd, a construction and engineering enterprise, which leased the property to eight managers as per an agreement. One of the directors of the company is the father of Vinod Kumar Katiyar, MLA from Bhognipur assembly constituency of Kanpur Dehat. Till a few years back, the MLA was himself a director in the company.
ACP-3 (Noida) Shyamjit Singh told TOI that the building was actually registered in the name of AVP Buildtech. “The company had given the property on rent to the accused. From here a manager Ramesh and others were running a sex racket. We have contacted the MLA but he has denied having any links with the accused and said that they were unaware of the activities going on there. When contacted, the MLA said that the company had simply leased the property to tenants and was unaware of the activities. “The property was taken on rent about three months back. The company would not know what these people were inside Some people did something wrong and went to jail. Also, I had resigned from the company four years ago.” Earlier, in 2019, the Economic Offenses Wing (EOW) of Delhi Police had registered an FIR against five directors of the company as well as the MLA for allegedly duping investors of the company’s real estate projects.TOI January reported in 2019 that the company was accused of placing advertisements for the housing project “AVP Orchard” on a land track in Noida. “Inspired by the advertisements, several investors approached the company at its registered office in Delhi. Then, Katiyar and his co-director Sanjeev Abrol introduced himself as authorized representatives of the firm along with others and presented a rosy picture during the conversation,” according to the FIR lodged by the EOW. The complainants said that the accused had till May 2014. The project was also promised to be completed. The buyers were asked to pay varying amounts as part of the installments. By 2014, they had paid 95%, however, during verification, it was found It was found that only half the project was completed.
The three-storey building (B-52) is owned by AVP Buildtech Pvt Ltd, a construction and engineering enterprise, which leased the property to eight managers as per an agreement. One of the directors of the company is the father of Vinod Kumar Katiyar, MLA from Bhognipur assembly constituency of Kanpur Dehat. Till a few years back, the MLA was himself a director in the company.
ACP-3 (Noida) Shyamjit Singh told TOI that the building was actually registered in the name of AVP Buildtech. “The company had given the property on rent to the accused. From here a manager Ramesh and others were running a sex racket. We have contacted the MLA but he has denied having any links with the accused and said that they were unaware of the activities going on there. When contacted, the MLA said that the company had simply leased the property to tenants and was unaware of the activities. “The property was taken on rent about three months back. The company would not know what these people were inside Some people did something wrong and went to jail. Also, I had resigned from the company four years ago.” Earlier, in 2019, the Economic Offenses Wing (EOW) of Delhi Police had registered an FIR against five directors of the company as well as the MLA for allegedly duping investors of the company’s real estate projects.TOI January reported in 2019 that the company was accused of placing advertisements for the housing project “AVP Orchard” on a land track in Noida. “Inspired by the advertisements, several investors approached the company at its registered office in Delhi. Then, Katiyar and his co-director Sanjeev Abrol introduced himself as authorized representatives of the firm along with others and presented a rosy picture during the conversation,” according to the FIR lodged by the EOW. The complainants said that the accused had till May 2014. The project was also promised to be completed. The buyers were asked to pay varying amounts as part of the installments. By 2014, they had paid 95%, however, during verification, it was found It was found that only half the project was completed.
.