New Delhi: Will the center dedicate All India Environmental Management Services (AIEMS) as per the recommendations of a high level committee headed by the former Cabinet Secretary TSR Subramaniam, The Supreme court asked Friday, despite having secret doubts about entering a highly opinionated herd about his jurisdiction.
A bench of Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and MM Sundaresh sent notice to the Center public interest litigation By Samar Vijay Singh, who argued through Senior Advocate K Sultan Singh that the recommendations of the Subramaniam Committee for setting up of National Environment Management Authority (NEMA) and State EMA to oversee the implementation of environmental protection measures in every project at the ground level Will go a long way. To stop the continuous attacks on the environment and forests, which are a great threat to the country.
Justice Kaul’s initial response to the PIL – “Do we handle the governance” – was pacified through a lengthy discussion initiated by Justice Sundaresh and finally the bench said, “However, it is doubtful whether any mandate (Supreme Court) but we are examining whether the Center has decided to accept the recommendations of the Subramaniam Committee.
The lawyer said that the governments are not serious about protecting the environment and every single green jurisprudence and step to protect the environment has come to the fore from the Supreme Court, which has passed several orders and judgments in this regard over the decades.
The Subramaniam Committee submitted its report to the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change on November 18, 2014.
It had recommended single-window environmental clearance for A-category projects through NEMA and B-category projects through SEMA.
A bench of Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and MM Sundaresh sent notice to the Center public interest litigation By Samar Vijay Singh, who argued through Senior Advocate K Sultan Singh that the recommendations of the Subramaniam Committee for setting up of National Environment Management Authority (NEMA) and State EMA to oversee the implementation of environmental protection measures in every project at the ground level Will go a long way. To stop the continuous attacks on the environment and forests, which are a great threat to the country.
Justice Kaul’s initial response to the PIL – “Do we handle the governance” – was pacified through a lengthy discussion initiated by Justice Sundaresh and finally the bench said, “However, it is doubtful whether any mandate (Supreme Court) but we are examining whether the Center has decided to accept the recommendations of the Subramaniam Committee.
The lawyer said that the governments are not serious about protecting the environment and every single green jurisprudence and step to protect the environment has come to the fore from the Supreme Court, which has passed several orders and judgments in this regard over the decades.
The Subramaniam Committee submitted its report to the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change on November 18, 2014.
It had recommended single-window environmental clearance for A-category projects through NEMA and B-category projects through SEMA.
,