Nainital : Supreme court A judge of the Uttarakhand High Court has removed “derogatory remarks” against a lawyer from four case orders, saying the remarks were “unnecessary”, indicating that “restraint and restraint” were missing and it seems That is based on “personal perception”. Judge.
“While it is of fundamental importance in the field of administration of justice that judges be allowed to discharge their functions freely and fearlessly and without interference from anyone, it is equally important for judges to exercise restraint and Avoid unnecessary remarks on conduct Rohinton Fali Nariman And Hrishikesh Roy said on Monday.
Neeraj Garg Advocating for 17 years. He had approached the apex court stating that the “adverse” remarks of a high court judge about his conduct on four occasions “may undermine (his) professional reputation”.
The judge called him a “seasonal lawyer”, saying Garg Was responsible for making arguments “for the brutal murder of the time” and “for the visitors’ gallery”. The judge had also alleged that Garg had tried to “mislead the court” with “compulsory” and irrelevant documents.
NS scheduled caste Said, “Derogatory comments … could have been avoided as they were unnecessary to settle disputes.” It said the comments appeared to be “based on personal perception” of the judge. “It is also clear that (Judge) has not given any opportunity to (Lawyer) to give his explanation,” the order said.
“While it is of fundamental importance in the field of administration of justice that judges be allowed to discharge their functions freely and fearlessly and without interference from anyone, it is equally important for judges to exercise restraint and Avoid unnecessary remarks on conduct Rohinton Fali Nariman And Hrishikesh Roy said on Monday.
Neeraj Garg Advocating for 17 years. He had approached the apex court stating that the “adverse” remarks of a high court judge about his conduct on four occasions “may undermine (his) professional reputation”.
The judge called him a “seasonal lawyer”, saying Garg Was responsible for making arguments “for the brutal murder of the time” and “for the visitors’ gallery”. The judge had also alleged that Garg had tried to “mislead the court” with “compulsory” and irrelevant documents.
NS scheduled caste Said, “Derogatory comments … could have been avoided as they were unnecessary to settle disputes.” It said the comments appeared to be “based on personal perception” of the judge. “It is also clear that (Judge) has not given any opportunity to (Lawyer) to give his explanation,” the order said.
.