Gurgaon: The CBI’s arrest of Jamia Millia Islamia professor Khalid Moin, who allegedly took bribes to certify the structural stability of buildings, has raised concerns voiced by residents of condominiums since the caves in Chintel on February 10. is underlined. Paradiso Regarding the ambiguity of the certification process that declares a flat and tower fit for residence.
The signatures of an architect and a structural engineer are the most valuable in the paperwork chain from the concept plan of a building to its final delivery. Without their certification, the occupation certificate – the document that certifies the home as ready for buyer’s possession – cannot be issued.
Curiously, Moin – who is believed to have told the CBI that he also authenticated Paradiso’s buildings – is a stranger to the Haryana government’s more than a month-long investigation into the cave – in which Two residents were killed as Gurgaon’s living room was razed. Five flats collapsed vertically in Tower D.
Moin’s name does not figure in the FIR lodged by the Gurgaon Police on February 13 against contractors, structural engineers, architects and others involved in the construction and certification of Sector 109 condominiums. The FIR was based on the recommendations of Haryana’s Town and Country Planning Department (DTCP), which oversees the licensing and delivery of condominiums.
The DTCP has held Ajay Sahni and Kunwar Khaleque Ahmed, structural engineer of BMSF Design Consultants and architect Ashish Jaiswal, responsible for issuing the structural certificate to Paradiso. The signatories to the OC issued to Paradiso include the then district town planner Mohan SinghSahni, Ahamed, Jaiswal and Chintels vice-president KK Singhal.
District Town Planner (Enforcement) RS BathThe person who filed the complaint with the police on behalf of DTCP said that Singhal had applied for the OC of Paradiso through Singhal. Later, Sahni, a structural engineer from IIT-Delhi and Ahmed, who graduated from Jamia Millia Islamia, and Jaiswal certified that the project work was supervised as per the approved building plans and its structural design and “to their satisfaction For “has been completed. The evidence was attested by the consultant,” Bath said.
According to the DTCP, Sawhney had submitted a structural stability certificate on the letterhead of BMSF Design Consultant Pvt Ltd, certifying that the Paradiso was designed as per the National Building Code and Bureau of Indian Standards for Structural Stability and was resistant to earthquakes. will face the impact of
The FIR includes sections 10 and 12 of the Haryana Development and Regulation of Urban Areas Act 1975 and sections 120B (criminal conspiracy), 417 (cheating), 420 (cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property), 465, 467 of the IPC. charged under. 468 (forgery) and 471 (using a forged document as a genuine).
Additional Deputy Commissioner Vishram Kumar Meena, who is heading the government probe committee, said the first round of statements of the construction contractor, repair agency and others have been recorded. “Once IIT-Delhi (which is studying the affected tower) submits its report, statements of others including the developer and structural engineers will be recorded,” he said.
When asked about Moin’s role, the Additional DC said that the police would look into it. A Chintel spokesperson said that while the structural strength certificate to Paradiso was issued by Delhi-based BMSF Design Consultants, “the person arrested in Delhi (Moin) had no role in giving the structural report related to the OC for Paradiso,” the spokesperson said. he said.
Meanwhile, a group of residents met Meena to ask why the government had agreed to conduct a structural audit of five housing projects – M3M Woodshire, on 23 February. Raheja Atharv And still not started by Vedanta, Brisk Lumbini and Mahindra Aura – IIT Roorkee. “We asked the ADC to expedite the audit process and share updates with residents,” said one resident, who had been living in panic since the Paradiso incident, which raised concerns about their own buildings. Was.
The signatures of an architect and a structural engineer are the most valuable in the paperwork chain from the concept plan of a building to its final delivery. Without their certification, the occupation certificate – the document that certifies the home as ready for buyer’s possession – cannot be issued.
Curiously, Moin – who is believed to have told the CBI that he also authenticated Paradiso’s buildings – is a stranger to the Haryana government’s more than a month-long investigation into the cave – in which Two residents were killed as Gurgaon’s living room was razed. Five flats collapsed vertically in Tower D.
Moin’s name does not figure in the FIR lodged by the Gurgaon Police on February 13 against contractors, structural engineers, architects and others involved in the construction and certification of Sector 109 condominiums. The FIR was based on the recommendations of Haryana’s Town and Country Planning Department (DTCP), which oversees the licensing and delivery of condominiums.
The DTCP has held Ajay Sahni and Kunwar Khaleque Ahmed, structural engineer of BMSF Design Consultants and architect Ashish Jaiswal, responsible for issuing the structural certificate to Paradiso. The signatories to the OC issued to Paradiso include the then district town planner Mohan SinghSahni, Ahamed, Jaiswal and Chintels vice-president KK Singhal.
District Town Planner (Enforcement) RS BathThe person who filed the complaint with the police on behalf of DTCP said that Singhal had applied for the OC of Paradiso through Singhal. Later, Sahni, a structural engineer from IIT-Delhi and Ahmed, who graduated from Jamia Millia Islamia, and Jaiswal certified that the project work was supervised as per the approved building plans and its structural design and “to their satisfaction For “has been completed. The evidence was attested by the consultant,” Bath said.
According to the DTCP, Sawhney had submitted a structural stability certificate on the letterhead of BMSF Design Consultant Pvt Ltd, certifying that the Paradiso was designed as per the National Building Code and Bureau of Indian Standards for Structural Stability and was resistant to earthquakes. will face the impact of
The FIR includes sections 10 and 12 of the Haryana Development and Regulation of Urban Areas Act 1975 and sections 120B (criminal conspiracy), 417 (cheating), 420 (cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property), 465, 467 of the IPC. charged under. 468 (forgery) and 471 (using a forged document as a genuine).
Additional Deputy Commissioner Vishram Kumar Meena, who is heading the government probe committee, said the first round of statements of the construction contractor, repair agency and others have been recorded. “Once IIT-Delhi (which is studying the affected tower) submits its report, statements of others including the developer and structural engineers will be recorded,” he said.
When asked about Moin’s role, the Additional DC said that the police would look into it. A Chintel spokesperson said that while the structural strength certificate to Paradiso was issued by Delhi-based BMSF Design Consultants, “the person arrested in Delhi (Moin) had no role in giving the structural report related to the OC for Paradiso,” the spokesperson said. he said.
Meanwhile, a group of residents met Meena to ask why the government had agreed to conduct a structural audit of five housing projects – M3M Woodshire, on 23 February. Raheja Atharv And still not started by Vedanta, Brisk Lumbini and Mahindra Aura – IIT Roorkee. “We asked the ADC to expedite the audit process and share updates with residents,” said one resident, who had been living in panic since the Paradiso incident, which raised concerns about their own buildings. Was.