Silicon Valley Bank Parent, CEO, CFO are Sued by Shareholders for Fraud

Last Update: March 14, 2023, 08:19 AM IST

A notice hangs on the door of the Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) on March 10, 2023 in San Francisco, California, US.  (Photo Credits: Reuters)

A notice hangs on the door of the Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) on March 10, 2023 in San Francisco, California, US. (Photo Credits: Reuters)

Silicon Valley Bank had an estimated $209 billion in assets and $175.4 billion in deposits before its collapse.

SVB Financial Group and two top executives were sued Monday by shareholders, who accused them of hiding how rising interest rates would leave its Silicon Valley bank unit, which failed last week, “exclusive physically susceptible” to running a bank.

The proposed class action against SVB, Chief Executive Greg Baker and Chief Financial Officer Daniel Beck was filed in federal court in San Jose, California.

It appears to be the first of several potential lawsuits over the demise of the Silicon Valley bank, which was seized by US regulators on March 10 after a surge in deposit withdrawals.

SVB stunned the market two days ago by disclosing an after-tax loss of $1.8 billion from the sale of investments and plans to raise capital as it scrambles to meet redemption requests.

The Silicon Valley bank held an estimated $209 billion in assets and $175.4 billion in deposits in the biggest US bank failure since the 2008 financial crisis.

Its collapse has sparked fears of contagion among other lenders, which cater to technology start-ups and venture capital-backed companies as well as wealthy clients including large regional banks.

In Monday’s lawsuit, shareholders led by Chandra Vanipenta said Santa Clara, California-based SVB failed to disclose how rising interest rates would undermine its business model, and treated it worse than banks with a diverse customer base. Will make

The lawsuit seeks unspecified damages for SVB investors between June 16, 2021 and March 10, 2023.

SVB on Monday said it will explore remaining strategic options for the company, which is now moving away from its core banking business.

The case is Vanipenta v. SVB Financial Group et al., US District Court, Northern District of California, No. 23-01097.

read all latest business news Here

(This story has not been edited by News18 staff and is published from a syndicated news agency feed)