Gaslighting is a psychological manipulation that involves cleverly altering a story to make a person doubt their reality. derived from the play 1938 gas light, the event shakes a person’s perceptions and leads them to seek credible grounds. We are guilty of gaslighting someone or being a victim of gaslighting, or both. Another aspect of this strategy is that the web that the gaslighter spreads over the psyche of its prey is slow and gradual.
Gaslighting can vary from an unconscious malice to a conscious intention to damage one’s mental space, from subtle to emotionally abusive, and from putting the victim in a temporary state to a permanent dent on the victim’s mind. This lays the groundwork for the fact that gaslighting is not a targeted, non-structural manipulation but a spectrum that varies on the degree of damage and the level of consciousness of the gaslighter.
Paget Norton, author good men project, cites a personal experience and divides the concept of gaslighting into four levels. As mentioned above that gaslighting is a spectrum, these four levels are based on the nature of the intent and the nature of the harm being done by the victim.
gaslighting? I don’t think I understand.
The first type of gaslighting is one where the gaslighter is not aware that they are indulging in the act of manipulating the gaslighting and giving minor earthquakes based on their own basis of reality. In this type, people are confused about the situation themselves and tend to think that the discomfort created in the discourse has nothing to do with their own actions, but to do with the fate of events unfolding. Not there. Due to this, they try to shift the responsibility on the victim and themselves cover their mind with a layer of oblivion.
I think I feel something wrong.”
The second type comes with consciousness a notch above the previous level of oblivion. The gaslighter may sense that something is off and the conversation is not getting a coherent end. However, instead of considering their own actions and attempting to eliminate the conflict, they attempt to stifle the discourse by over-explaining things. As Paget puts it, the second type defends the “flood of words” and over-analyzes and explains things without realizing the effect gaslight has had on them.
“I’m just trying to convince you and not gaslighting you.”
The third type comes with a renewed realization of the events unfolding in a conflicting conversation. This is because the main objective of these types of people is not to gaslight, but to achieve an overall victory in the conversation, which is a debate for them. They don’t want to harm you; Rather, they seek to protect their ego – a classic case of a power struggle.
“You think you’re better? Let me give you a reality check.”
This is someone who is fully aware and purposefully gaslighting you despite knowing the effect it is having on the victim’s mind. Taking the victim down, lying to them, using their weaknesses against them, confusing them and aligning people against them are classic signs of gaslighters.
People who indulge in gaslighting tend to cause others to believe in themselves and those around them that are not true. Gaslighting is more prevalent than people think and can happen to you, or you can do it in various forms to others.
Keywords: gaslighting, gaslighter, gaslighting, effect, emotional, derivative
read all breaking news, breaking news And coronavirus news Here
.