AHMEDABAD: The Gujarat excessive court docket on Thursday issued a discover to the Centre, the College Grants Fee (UGC)and different authorities involved over a petition looking for removing of Rama Dubey from the put up of the vice-chancellor of the Central College of Gujarat (CUG) claiming that Dubey’s appointment is prohibited.
Petitioner Naveen Nautiyal from Uttarakhand has filed a quo warranto petition and alleged that Dubey’s appointment is a case of favouritism by the central authority and his appointment is opposite to the provisions of the UGC rules and Statute-2 of the Central Universities Act, 2009. He has urged the HC to ask the vice-chancellor to indicate underneath what authority he’s holding the put up.
Dubey (66) was appointed as VC within the college in 2019. By inserting data earlier than the excessive court docket, the petitioner claimed that the search committee had performed interviews for the put up of VC and finalized and beneficial 4 names for appointment. The secretary of the Union ministry of schooling “in an unprecedented method directed the search committee to ship 5 names”. The Centre has no authority to take action. Dubey’s title was included and he was appointed as VC. “The secretary has no energy to ask or intrude in suggestions of the choice committee and solely the Customer of the college (President of India) has the authority to ask for prolonged contemporary panels.”
The petitioner additional claimed, “The secretary has overreached his jurisdiction in calling for fifth title and appoint him on the put up. The choice committee didn’t discover Dubey appropriate for the put up after his interview.” He alleged that the Centre’s motion smacks malade and favouritism.
After issuing discover, Justice Biren Vaishnav has posted additional listening to on September 13.
FbTwitterInstagramKOO APPYOUTUBE