New Delhi: A court here has directed the Delhi Police to register an FIR on the complaint. Kamal Kumar Guptadirector PP JewelersIn Delhi against his son for allegedly transferring his rights in his name through forged partnership deed of the company.
While passing the order, Metropolitan Magistrate Umesh Kumar said that prima facie there was sufficient material to conduct a thorough investigation in the matter.
“After going through the complaint and the status report filed by the Inquiry Officer (IO), the complaint made contains all elements of a cognizable offence.
“Therefore, in the light of the judgment passed by the apex court, the concerned SHO is directed to register an FIR and conduct a thorough investigation in the present matter,” the judge said, and sought compliance report by May 31.
As per the complaint, the accused changed the constitution of the partnership firm on the basis of forged partnership deed dated 1 October 2014.
It claimed that the complainant came to know about a letter written on October 28, 2015 State Bank Of Bikaner and Jaipur to the partnership firm in respect of change in constitution of the firm on the basis of forged partnership deed.
Gupta alleged that his son had forged a false, forged and fabricated document, i.e. the alleged partnership deed, and used it for fraud by depositing it with SBI, a subsidiary. Industries Commissionerand the Office of the Industries Commissioner.
He alleged that the partnership firm was acting in the regular course of business and the partners have never been changed from 1st April 2005 in the partnership and the balance sheet of the partnership is being filed regularly.
Furthermore, the son was never a partner in the company and both are facing a lot of lawsuits.
“Also, they used to live in the same house till 2015 and the son was handling the affairs, during which time they used to receive a lot of correspondence which did not come to the notice of the father and many communications were deliberately concealed by the son,” the complaint said. accused of.
While passing the order, Metropolitan Magistrate Umesh Kumar said that prima facie there was sufficient material to conduct a thorough investigation in the matter.
“After going through the complaint and the status report filed by the Inquiry Officer (IO), the complaint made contains all elements of a cognizable offence.
“Therefore, in the light of the judgment passed by the apex court, the concerned SHO is directed to register an FIR and conduct a thorough investigation in the present matter,” the judge said, and sought compliance report by May 31.
As per the complaint, the accused changed the constitution of the partnership firm on the basis of forged partnership deed dated 1 October 2014.
It claimed that the complainant came to know about a letter written on October 28, 2015 State Bank Of Bikaner and Jaipur to the partnership firm in respect of change in constitution of the firm on the basis of forged partnership deed.
Gupta alleged that his son had forged a false, forged and fabricated document, i.e. the alleged partnership deed, and used it for fraud by depositing it with SBI, a subsidiary. Industries Commissionerand the Office of the Industries Commissioner.
He alleged that the partnership firm was acting in the regular course of business and the partners have never been changed from 1st April 2005 in the partnership and the balance sheet of the partnership is being filed regularly.
Furthermore, the son was never a partner in the company and both are facing a lot of lawsuits.
“Also, they used to live in the same house till 2015 and the son was handling the affairs, during which time they used to receive a lot of correspondence which did not come to the notice of the father and many communications were deliberately concealed by the son,” the complaint said. accused of.