Court seeks information about the release of a film based on the life of Sushant Singh Rajput

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday sought to know whether the film ‘Nyay: The Justice’, which is reportedly based on the life of the late Bollywood Actor Sushant Singh Rajput, the film’s director and the actor’s father have been released as scheduled on June 11 after making contradictory statements on the aspect. The high court was hearing an appeal filed by Rajput’s father Krishan Kishore Singh challenging a single judge’s order refusing to stay the film’s release or allow anyone to play his son in films. Was told to stop using the name or likeness.

A vacation bench of Justices Anoop Jairam Bhambhani and Jasmeet Singh raised a preliminary question whether the film was scheduled on June 11 on the OTT platform. A lot depends on whether the film is released or not. If it is released, the matter may await the roster bench. If it has not been issued, the court may be inclined to hear it now (during the holidays).

The bench asked whether the film has already been released, can it reverse it now and ring a bell? Senior advocate Jayant Mehta, representing Rajput’s father, said it has not been released yet. However, Chander Lal, senior advocate for the film director, submitted that his directions are contrary.

To this, senior advocate Harish Salve, representing Rajput’s father, suggested that this fact be verified before proceeding with the matter. Let the fact be confirmed, the bench said. List on June 25 to confirm this aspect.

The single judge had on June 10 refused to stay the release of several films, including ‘Nyay: The Justice’, saying these films were neither portrayed as biopics nor depicted what happened in his life. Factual description. “Posthumous right to privacy is not allowed”, it had said in its interim order on a plea by Rajput’s father to ban such films.

During the hearing, Mehta said that the difficulty is not only in the release of the film, but also in the manner in which the orders are passed by the single judge. He said that the film is violative of the right to privacy and right to a fair trial and with every passing day it is harming the reputation of the actor. The court also asked the plaintiff’s counsel to give a copy of the appeal to the lawyer of the film director, who claimed that he had not received it.

The single judge had earlier said that it has found merit in the productions of the producers and directors that if the information about the events is already in the public domain, then no request for infringement of right to privacy can be made on a film inspired by such events. . Some of the upcoming or proposed film projects based on his son’s life are ‘Nyay: The Justice’, ‘Suicide or Murder: A Star Was Lost’, ‘Shashank’ and an unnamed crowd-funded film.

The court had directed the filmmakers to furnish a full account of the revenue earned from the films, if any case of loss arises in future and listed the suit before the joint registrar for completion of the petition. It had said that the producers and directors have claimed that the film is a fictionalized depiction of true events surrounding the lives of film/TV personalities, including Rajput, who were reportedly found dead at their home in Mumbai. The investigation is still on.

The court had said that it does not find merit in the plaintiff’s plea of ​​restraint on the strength of his right to a fair trial in relation to the unnatural death of his son, that no ground has been established to show how the films will affect the trial. . It had rejected the plaintiff’s contention that the contents of the film were defamatory and would harm the reputation of him and his son.

The suit claimed that if “film, web-series, book or any other material of a similar nature is allowed to be published or broadcast, it would affect the right of the victim and the deceased to a free and fair trial as may be prescribed”. That this may lead to prejudice against him.” It has also argued that Rajput being a well-known personality, “any misuse of his name/image/caricature/style of giving dialogues may also lead to the plaintiffs apart from acts. is a violation of the right of the individual to pass away.”

Filmmakers of upcoming and proposed films have opposed Rajput’s father’s pleas.

read all Breaking Newshandjob today’s fresh news and coronavirus news Here

.

Leave a Reply