custodian of cricket laws, Marylebone Cricket Club Controversial was reclassified earlier this month run outFrom ‘unfair play’ of Law 41 and included within Law 38 relating to lawful run outs.
This is one of nine changes made by the MCC to its code, which will be effective from October this year.
Ashwin said the bowler’s decision not to run out the last batsman could have a career impact.
“My dear fellow bowlers, please understand. The extra step that a non-striker is taking can destroy your entire career,” said Ashwin, who ignited a debate about the legality of the strategy by dismissing England. joss butler In an Indian Premier League match in 2019, said in a YouTube video.
ICC spoils the run out at the non-striker’s end. Pakistan vs Australia | Cricket around the world | E2
“If the non-striker ends up on strike because of that extra move, he can hit a six. Whereas the current striker can be out. If you take a wicket, you You will progress in your career, whereas if you are hit for a six, your career may go downhill.So the impact is huge.
“So, bowlers shouldn’t have a second thought about getting the non-striker out, my opinion. The non-striker is very specific on the non-striker who doesn’t take extra yardage before delivering the ball to the bowler. They give There are allowances to the bowler. That is the importance of the rule.”
After facing criticism all these years for his controversial bowler’s run out of Butler, Ashwin was hopeful that people would stop ridiculing him, especially now that he has become the English all-rounder’s teammate at Rajasthan Royals .
(IPL photo)
“In my school days, if a boy was interested in a girl, his friends would shout the boy’s name when the girl passed by. Similarly when I am playing, the crowd would shout ‘Butler, butler’ at me Why do you guys do this? Now we’re teammates, guys.
Ashwin, who was picked by Rajasthan Royals for the upcoming IPL for Rs 5 crore, said, “It is really unfair play in this whole scenario for a non-striker to leave the crease early, not the bowler to run him out.”
The dismissal came to be known as the “Mankad run-out” after former India all-rounder Vinoo Mankad was run out twice by Australia opener Bill Brown on the non-striker’s end – once for Australia XI at the SCG in 1947. In a tour game against. , and then in the second Test of the upcoming series.
“Now it has been changed to run out. They (MCC) have destroyed the whole concept and termed it as the run-out law. The bowler was expected to give the first warning when the batsman left the crease at the non-striker’s end. gives. Ashwin said.
“Now they have declared that what the non-striker is doing is wrong and therefore, bowlers can actually run them out if the non-striker tries to leave the crease before the bowler has delivered the ball.
“The bowlers used to feel bad doing this, wondering how our team’s batsmen would feel and what the cricket world would think if we did. So, thinking about these consequences, they didn’t run them out.”