Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud made important comments on Tuesday during the review of the death sentence verdict. Quoting lines from the Supreme Court’s review, he said courts should avoid patriarchal or patriarchal remarks.
The CJI said, ‘The son runs the dynasty, he will be the support of the parents in old age, such comments should be avoided.’ A bench headed by CJI Justice Hima Kohli and Justice PS Narasimha was hearing the review petition of the death sentence awarded to a man convicted of kidnapping and murder of a 7-year-old boy in Chennai. During this, CJI Chandrachud referred to the previous hearing of the Supreme Court.
Previous observations of the Supreme Court, on which the CJI consulted
The Supreme Court had said in the last review, ‘The killing of the only boy for any purpose has a very serious impact on the parents. It is a great torment for the parents who have lost their only child. The child who would carry on their lineage and take care of them in their old age. This murder is a huge calamity on the victims.
CJI read the comment of Supreme Court and then put his view
When the CJI reviewed the matter on Tuesday, he saw the previous comment of the Supreme Court. He said, ‘Killing a child is a very cruel act in itself. In such a situation, the issue before the court cannot be whether the minor child is a boy or a girl. Murder in itself is a great sorrow. In such a situation, the court should not say that he was a boy and started the dynasty or took care of the parents in their old age. Such comments unwittingly add a patriarchal and patriarchal perspective to the decisions. One should stay away from them.
death sentence commuted to life imprisonment
The matter is of 2009. Convict Sundararajan had kidnapped the child on her way to school. He had told the child that his mother and grandmother were not well and he had to accompany her to the hospital. The child was the only one. His parents could not pay the ransom to release the child. The convict had admitted in the court that when the ransom was not received, he had strangled the child, tied his body in a gunny bag and threw it in a water tank.
Sundararajan was sentenced to death by the Supreme Court in February 2013. However, after 5 years in November 2018, the court had agreed to review its decision of death sentence. After this the death sentence was commuted to 20 years imprisonment.
Also read these news related to Supreme Court…
Is there a less painful method of punishment than hanging
The Supreme Court, during a hearing on March 21, said that the central government should consider whether there could be any other method of execution of death sentence instead of hanging, which would be less painful than the hanging method. The court has asked Attorney General R Venkataraman to form an expert committee to study and collect information in this regard. Read full news…
Rape-murder accused of minor to be hanged in 70 days
The special POCSO court in Dungarpur has sentenced the culprit to death in the case of rape and murder of a 10-year-old innocent. At the same time, a fine of Rs 5 lakh has also been imposed on the culprit. In the case, the police presented the challan in 20 days. While completing the hearing in 70 days, Judge Sanjay Kumar Bhatnagar has given this verdict. Read full news…
Supreme Court will not hear separate cases of demonetisation
The Supreme Court refused to entertain separate cases of accepting Rs 500-1000 notes that were demonetised in 2016. Also said that for this the petitioner should go to the Central Government. The court also directed the government to fix responsibility on the exchange of 500-1000 notes within 12 weeks. Read full news…
There is more news…
सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने कहा-अदालतें पितृसत्तात्मक टिप्पणी से बचें: CJI बोले- केवल लड़का ही बुढ़ापे में मां-बाप का सहारा बनेगा, इस धारणा को आगे न बढ़ाएं
New Delhi10 minutes ago
Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud made important comments on Tuesday during the review of the death sentence verdict. Quoting lines from the Supreme Court’s review, he said courts should avoid patriarchal or patriarchal remarks.
The CJI said, ‘The son runs the dynasty, he will be the support of the parents in old age, such comments should be avoided.’ A bench headed by CJI Justice Hima Kohli and Justice PS Narasimha was hearing the review petition of the death sentence awarded to a man convicted of kidnapping and murder of a 7-year-old boy in Chennai. During this, CJI Chandrachud referred to the previous hearing of the Supreme Court.
Previous observations of the Supreme Court, on which the CJI consulted
The Supreme Court had said in the last review, ‘The killing of the only boy for any purpose has a very serious impact on the parents. It is a great torment for the parents who have lost their only child. The child who would carry on their lineage and take care of them in their old age. This murder is a huge calamity on the victims.
CJI read the comment of Supreme Court and then put his view
When the CJI reviewed the matter on Tuesday, he saw the previous comment of the Supreme Court. He said, ‘Killing a child is a very cruel act in itself. In such a situation, the issue before the court cannot be whether the minor child is a boy or a girl. Murder in itself is a great sorrow. In such a situation, the court should not say that he was a boy and started the dynasty or took care of the parents in their old age. Such comments unwittingly add a patriarchal and patriarchal perspective to the decisions. One should stay away from them.
death sentence commuted to life imprisonment
The matter is of 2009. Convict Sundararajan had kidnapped the child on her way to school. He had told the child that his mother and grandmother were not well and he had to accompany her to the hospital. The child was the only one. His parents could not pay the ransom to release the child. The convict had admitted in the court that when the ransom was not received, he had strangled the child, tied his body in a gunny bag and threw it in a water tank.
Sundararajan was sentenced to death by the Supreme Court in February 2013. However, after 5 years in November 2018, the court had agreed to review its decision of death sentence. After this the death sentence was commuted to 20 years imprisonment.
Also read these news related to Supreme Court…
Is there a less painful method of punishment than hanging
The Supreme Court, during a hearing on March 21, said that the central government should consider whether there could be any other method of execution of death sentence instead of hanging, which would be less painful than the hanging method. The court has asked Attorney General R Venkataraman to form an expert committee to study and collect information in this regard. Read full news…
Rape-murder accused of minor to be hanged in 70 days
The special POCSO court in Dungarpur has sentenced the culprit to death in the case of rape and murder of a 10-year-old innocent. At the same time, a fine of Rs 5 lakh has also been imposed on the culprit. In the case, the police presented the challan in 20 days. While completing the hearing in 70 days, Judge Sanjay Kumar Bhatnagar has given this verdict. Read full news…
Supreme Court will not hear separate cases of demonetisation
The Supreme Court refused to entertain separate cases of accepting Rs 500-1000 notes that were demonetised in 2016. Also said that for this the petitioner should go to the Central Government. The court also directed the government to fix responsibility on the exchange of 500-1000 notes within 12 weeks. Read full news…