MELBOURNE: An Australian court on Thursday said it had sacked the tennis superstar Nowaki Djokovic defies challenge to cancel his visa as minister who reasonably believed that Djokovic, who has not been vaccinated against COVID-19, could be a risk to the community .
federal court It also rejected the argument that there was no evidence that Djokovic ever urged anyone not to vaccinate, saying it was open to speculation that the public would assume that he was opposed to vaccination. because he said he was not vaccinated.
The judges said, “An iconic world tennis star can impress people of all ages, young or old, but perhaps especially young and influential, to emulate them. It’s not fiction; it doesn’t require proof.” ,” said the judges.
Djokovic’s saga has fueled a global debate over the rights of those who choose not to vaccinate as governments look to protect the community from the coronavirus pandemic.
Djokovic was exiled from Australia On Sunday night, just hours after the court rejected his attempt to stay in the country to play at the Australian Open, where he was expected to win a record 21st major title.
This was followed by an 11-day rollercoaster that included two visa cancellations, two court challenges and five nights over two nights at an immigration detention hotel where asylum seekers are kept.
His lawyers argued that it should be canceled on the grounds that the Minister of Immigration alex hawkdecision was irrational, it lacked evidence that DjokovicPresence in Australia may stir up anti-vaccination sentiment, and it fails to consider that deporting Djokovic could spark anti-vax sentiment.
Another minister may have decided not to revoke the visa after the Federal Court said Immigration Minister Alex Hawke had taken the right steps under a law that allows him to revoke the visa as long as he is satisfied that the visa holder “There may be a risk to the health or well-being of the Australian community”.
The Chief Justice said, “The Minister reached a position of satisfaction on the ground that it cannot be said to be irrational or illogical or based on relevant material.” James Allsop and judge Anthony Besanko and David O’Callaghan said in his reasons submitted on Thursday.
The Serbian now runs the risk of missing the next tennis Grand Slam event – the French Open – as the country’s sports ministry said a new vaccine pass law approved on Sunday would not exempt any.
federal court It also rejected the argument that there was no evidence that Djokovic ever urged anyone not to vaccinate, saying it was open to speculation that the public would assume that he was opposed to vaccination. because he said he was not vaccinated.
The judges said, “An iconic world tennis star can impress people of all ages, young or old, but perhaps especially young and influential, to emulate them. It’s not fiction; it doesn’t require proof.” ,” said the judges.
Djokovic’s saga has fueled a global debate over the rights of those who choose not to vaccinate as governments look to protect the community from the coronavirus pandemic.
Djokovic was exiled from Australia On Sunday night, just hours after the court rejected his attempt to stay in the country to play at the Australian Open, where he was expected to win a record 21st major title.
This was followed by an 11-day rollercoaster that included two visa cancellations, two court challenges and five nights over two nights at an immigration detention hotel where asylum seekers are kept.
His lawyers argued that it should be canceled on the grounds that the Minister of Immigration alex hawkdecision was irrational, it lacked evidence that DjokovicPresence in Australia may stir up anti-vaccination sentiment, and it fails to consider that deporting Djokovic could spark anti-vax sentiment.
Another minister may have decided not to revoke the visa after the Federal Court said Immigration Minister Alex Hawke had taken the right steps under a law that allows him to revoke the visa as long as he is satisfied that the visa holder “There may be a risk to the health or well-being of the Australian community”.
The Chief Justice said, “The Minister reached a position of satisfaction on the ground that it cannot be said to be irrational or illogical or based on relevant material.” James Allsop and judge Anthony Besanko and David O’Callaghan said in his reasons submitted on Thursday.
The Serbian now runs the risk of missing the next tennis Grand Slam event – the French Open – as the country’s sports ministry said a new vaccine pass law approved on Sunday would not exempt any.
,