Guwahati: Violent clashes with Assam Mizoram The inter-state border was most undesirable for the government but the incident has drawn sharp critics of the chief minister. Himanta Biswa Sarma on the same pole with him.
even as Congress Blamed Sarma’s brief stint as chief minister as a sign of the worst chief minister’s tenure in the state, a frequent target of the BJP and the face of the anti-CAA movement, Akhil Gogoi, AIUDF supremo. Badruddin Ajmali And ethnic-regional groups like the Asom Jatiya Abadi Yuva Chhatra Parishad (AJYCP) have come together to save Sarma, whose name was registered in an FIR by the Mizoram Police soon after last week’s clashes.
Rajor Dal president and MLA, Akhil, who has been part of an all-party delegation that had visited the clash site, Lailapur, said he stood with Sarma and the Assam government over the border dispute with Mizoram. “Six people of Assam have been killed by Mizoram. In such a crisis situation for the state, everyone in Assam should remain united. There was lack of sense of unity in Assam. We want Mizoram government to file an FIR against the Chief Minister. Condemn the police. Himanta Biswa Sarma,” Akhil told TOI on Sunday, when he returned to Guwahati.
As the two states kept accusing each other of allegedly violating the “constitutional boundary”, Akhil’s observation that Mizoram came within the Assam region for about 7.5 km in Cachar district became the bone of contention. Is. “Mizoram government, its administration, police, community and civil society are united. They feel that it is not wrong to occupy the land of Assam by crossing the constitutional limit. Instead, he feels that this is his agenda,” Akhil said. However, he acknowledged that in the face of Mizoram’s “aggressive attitude”, Assam is only “reacting” to the unrest along the border.
Sources said Mizoram is ready to withdraw the FIR against Sarma, but Akhil lashed out at him for daring to file an FIR in Mizoram. “We can criticize the chief minister, but cannot accept the Mizoram government’s decision to file an FIR against him,” Akhil said.
AIUDF chief Badruddin Ajmal even went as far as to say that the Assam CM should register a case against his Mizoram counterpart. “What wrong has our CM done? Did he open fire at the inter-state border? Instead, our CM should file a case against him Mizoram CMAjmal said a case should be registered against the “killers” from Mizoram.
AJYCP, one of the leading organizations of Assam, said that as far as the security of the land of Assam is concerned, it will remain with the Assam government and the Chief Minister. “The FIR against the Assam CM is unacceptable. With regard to land, they cannot file a case against our CM. AJYCP cannot settle for even an inch of Assam’s land.”
He said that AJYCP will remain on the protest path when the government adopts “anti-people” policies, but their support is with the Assam government on land issues. AJYCP is one of the prominent organizations fighting for the rights of the indigenous people of Assam over their land and resources. Barua blamed successive governments at the Center for allegedly failing to resolve inter-state border disputes between north-eastern states, many of which were carried out from Assam.
even as Congress Blamed Sarma’s brief stint as chief minister as a sign of the worst chief minister’s tenure in the state, a frequent target of the BJP and the face of the anti-CAA movement, Akhil Gogoi, AIUDF supremo. Badruddin Ajmali And ethnic-regional groups like the Asom Jatiya Abadi Yuva Chhatra Parishad (AJYCP) have come together to save Sarma, whose name was registered in an FIR by the Mizoram Police soon after last week’s clashes.
Rajor Dal president and MLA, Akhil, who has been part of an all-party delegation that had visited the clash site, Lailapur, said he stood with Sarma and the Assam government over the border dispute with Mizoram. “Six people of Assam have been killed by Mizoram. In such a crisis situation for the state, everyone in Assam should remain united. There was lack of sense of unity in Assam. We want Mizoram government to file an FIR against the Chief Minister. Condemn the police. Himanta Biswa Sarma,” Akhil told TOI on Sunday, when he returned to Guwahati.
As the two states kept accusing each other of allegedly violating the “constitutional boundary”, Akhil’s observation that Mizoram came within the Assam region for about 7.5 km in Cachar district became the bone of contention. Is. “Mizoram government, its administration, police, community and civil society are united. They feel that it is not wrong to occupy the land of Assam by crossing the constitutional limit. Instead, he feels that this is his agenda,” Akhil said. However, he acknowledged that in the face of Mizoram’s “aggressive attitude”, Assam is only “reacting” to the unrest along the border.
Sources said Mizoram is ready to withdraw the FIR against Sarma, but Akhil lashed out at him for daring to file an FIR in Mizoram. “We can criticize the chief minister, but cannot accept the Mizoram government’s decision to file an FIR against him,” Akhil said.
AIUDF chief Badruddin Ajmal even went as far as to say that the Assam CM should register a case against his Mizoram counterpart. “What wrong has our CM done? Did he open fire at the inter-state border? Instead, our CM should file a case against him Mizoram CMAjmal said a case should be registered against the “killers” from Mizoram.
AJYCP, one of the leading organizations of Assam, said that as far as the security of the land of Assam is concerned, it will remain with the Assam government and the Chief Minister. “The FIR against the Assam CM is unacceptable. With regard to land, they cannot file a case against our CM. AJYCP cannot settle for even an inch of Assam’s land.”
He said that AJYCP will remain on the protest path when the government adopts “anti-people” policies, but their support is with the Assam government on land issues. AJYCP is one of the prominent organizations fighting for the rights of the indigenous people of Assam over their land and resources. Barua blamed successive governments at the Center for allegedly failing to resolve inter-state border disputes between north-eastern states, many of which were carried out from Assam.
.