Udupi: Landlords affected after their plea with current government failed to achieve desired results special leave petition (SLP) ‘Karnataka Town and Country Planning (Regulation of Unauthorized Development) Rules 2013’ KPCC President DK Shivakumar To expedite the hearing of SLPs and eliminate their troubles.
The issue pertains to several people, including NRIs, professors, doctors, engineers and middle-class people, who bought converted land by developers in and around Udupi two decades ago. The buyers later realized that they could not build anything because these layouts remained “rejected”. Udupi Urban Development Authority (New)
The petitioners admitted that since their land was registered by the UUDA, they failed to recognize that their site was illegal.
He wondered that though the KTCP rules of 1984 are applicable across the state, how was the UUDA unaware of it?
“If UEDA had closed site registration, we would not have been in this situation,” said Robert D’Souza, Taranath HegdeKamlesh, Melvin Rego, Vasudev Gadiyar, Balachandra Bhat and Stephen.
Former minister Pramod Madhavraj urged Shivakumar to take up the issue at the party level to close the issue. The petitioners met him when he was in Udupi on Tuesday.
Taranath Hegde, a NRI now settled in Udupi, is a victim of this anomaly. He said the state amended the Bangalore Development Authority (Amendment) Act, which came into force on July 10, 2020, and the KTCP Act amendment which came into force on July 31, 2020. Since this is applicable only to Bengaluru, Akrama Sakrama cases in the rest of the state should be resolved through arbitration,” he said.
Hegde’s land. Bought 20 years ago, is registered in his name, and has a tenancy right certificate, but he cannot build a house because UUDA will not give him a site approval.
Though he had applied for the Akrama Sakrama scheme launched in February 2015, the application was not processed.
Till then social activists had filed a public interest litigation against it in the High Court. When HC overruled it, Namma Bengaluru Foundation challenges Akrama Sakarama laws supreme court of india in 2017.
The issue pertains to several people, including NRIs, professors, doctors, engineers and middle-class people, who bought converted land by developers in and around Udupi two decades ago. The buyers later realized that they could not build anything because these layouts remained “rejected”. Udupi Urban Development Authority (New)
The petitioners admitted that since their land was registered by the UUDA, they failed to recognize that their site was illegal.
He wondered that though the KTCP rules of 1984 are applicable across the state, how was the UUDA unaware of it?
“If UEDA had closed site registration, we would not have been in this situation,” said Robert D’Souza, Taranath HegdeKamlesh, Melvin Rego, Vasudev Gadiyar, Balachandra Bhat and Stephen.
Former minister Pramod Madhavraj urged Shivakumar to take up the issue at the party level to close the issue. The petitioners met him when he was in Udupi on Tuesday.
Taranath Hegde, a NRI now settled in Udupi, is a victim of this anomaly. He said the state amended the Bangalore Development Authority (Amendment) Act, which came into force on July 10, 2020, and the KTCP Act amendment which came into force on July 31, 2020. Since this is applicable only to Bengaluru, Akrama Sakrama cases in the rest of the state should be resolved through arbitration,” he said.
Hegde’s land. Bought 20 years ago, is registered in his name, and has a tenancy right certificate, but he cannot build a house because UUDA will not give him a site approval.
Though he had applied for the Akrama Sakrama scheme launched in February 2015, the application was not processed.
Till then social activists had filed a public interest litigation against it in the High Court. When HC overruled it, Namma Bengaluru Foundation challenges Akrama Sakarama laws supreme court of india in 2017.
.