Minister Says Adani ‘Raked Up’ To Brighten Rahul Gandhi’s Political Career

Union Law Minister Kiren Rijiju on Saturday attacked Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, saying he has failed politically and claimed that the Adani issue was being “deliberately” raised to “brighten his political career”. “. He also accused the Congress of weakening the judiciary and said that if the opposition party tries to ‘tear’ the Constitution by attacking the judiciary, ‘we will not sit silent’.

“I am not going to comment on it (Hindenburg-Adani issue) because the Supreme Court has already constituted a committee and is looking into it. But I want to say that all this will affect his political career. Being done to brighten.” Rahul Gandhi,” Rijiju told reporters on the sidelines of a function at Jammu University here. He said it was being made an issue “deliberately”.

The senior BJP leader said, “The country is governed by the Constitution and the law of the land. One person has failed politically and they are trying to stir up controversies, make it an issue to brighten their career.” Rijiju was here to launch the first edition of the Constitution of India in Dogri language. Rijiju said, “The Congress is in despair and is attacking the judiciary, but the government will not remain silent.” Case.

Gandhi’s conviction and two-year sentence in the case over his “Modi surname” remark led to his disqualification as a member of the Lok Sabha last month. The law minister alleged, “Congress has a habit (of issuing threats against the judiciary). Its leaders had attacked the judiciary even before the Emergency was imposed in 1975 and they will attack more because of their frustration.

Rijiju said that we are the followers of the constitution and we will not remain silent if they try to break the constitution. He said that Union Home Minister Amit Shah has rightly said that a person associated with dynastic politics is in danger, not democracy. Hitting out at Gandhi’s recent remarks in Britain, Shah had on Friday said in Uttar Pradesh that it was not democracy that was in danger, but “your family” and the idea of ​​dynasty politics.