Has the location of Noah’s ark finally been proven using 3D scans?

In 1959, a cartographer named Ilhan Durupinar discovered a boat-shaped footprint on the top of a mountain in the Dogubayazit region in Turkey. Now, American researchers and Turkish scientists from the project that discovered Noah’s Ark claim they have evidence that biblical remains lie beneath Durupinar’s surface.

Using 3D scans of GPR and ERT technology, the researchers claim they uncovered a man-made boat structure beneath the ground before they began digging. According to the team, the formation identified in the scan matches the dimensions of the Genesis description of Noah’s Ark.

this week’s Torah portion Tells the story of Noah’s instructions to build an ark and take with him a male and a female of each animal. The text contains specific details about the size and structure of the vessel: length 300 cubits, width 50 cubits and height 30 cubits. hand, a biblical word called but In Hebrew, it means “forehead”, and is estimated to be about 18 inches, or about half a meter long.
The Torah further tells us that the ark landed on the hills of Mount Ararat, a dormant volcano near the eastern border. Turkey. Durupinar site is about 30 km south of the mountain.

Researcher Andrew Jones of the Department of Applied Geophysics of the University of Istanbul’s Department of Geophysical Engineering and lead scientist Dr. Fethi Ahmet Yuksel believes the scan results indicate a man-made artifact beneath the surface that may well be the Ark, and is eager to continue studying the location.

“New GPR data shows parallel lines and angular structures 8 to 20 feet down,” the team claimed on its project website. “These parallel lines and right angles beneath the surface are something you wouldn’t expect to see in a natural, geologic structure.”

Mount Ararat overlooking an area of ​​eroding Khachkars (Armenian cross-stones) in western Armenia, from the book '100 (1915-2015)'.  (Credit: Here 'Hawk' Khacherian)Mount Ararat overlooking an area of ​​eroding Khachkars (Armenian cross-stones) in western Armenia, from the book ‘100 (1915-2015)’. (Credit: Here ‘Hawk’ Khacherian)

However, the scientific world is not ready to accept this notion. Since the original discovery by a Turkish captain, the Durupinar site has been repeatedly questioned and denied as to its location. Noah’s Ark. From the 1970s to the 1990s, American researcher Ron Wyatt studied the site and published his discoveries, which geologist Lawrence Collins systematically dismissed in 1996 in the Journal of Geosciences Education, describing the findings as an unusual structure. With rejected as natural rock formation.
The spikes and collapses in public and academic interest were enough to lead Turkey The Ministry of Culture placed the site under national protection and labeled it a national park, but no official excavation projects have been approved. Several independent teams both Turkish and foreign are studying the site together.

Even after the original discovery was considered superficial and a natural phenomenon, some people never gave up on the belief that the original ark lay beneath its surface. Perhaps the findings of Noah’s Ark scans, using technology that was not present during previous campaigns, may influence decisions about a thorough investigation of the site that could potentially hide one of history’s most important relics. Is.