Chandigarh: Punjab and Haryana The High Court on Tuesday issued notices to the Haryana government and the CBI on a plea challenging the decision not to grant sanction to prosecute four policemen who had falsely implicated a bus conductor in the sensational murder of a seven-year-old boy in a school. Gurugram in 2017.
HC Justice Arvind Singh Sangwan issued the notice after taking cognizance of a petition filed by the father of the deceased boy, seeking prosecution of these cops who wrongly refuted the theory of sexual abuse of his son. which had brought humiliation and humiliation to the victim and her family.
The petitioner has also argued that the right to peace of the deceased victim has been grossly violated by making all efforts to free the main accused and falsely implicate an innocent person.
The CBI on January 6 filed a supplementary charge sheet under sections 120B, 166A, 167, 330 and 506 of the IPC in the special CBI court in Panchkula for making false and fabricated charges against four policemen Narinder Singh Khatana, Biram Singh, Shamsher Singh. did. Subhash Chand Haryana Police.
However, Haryana’s home department The CBI had on February 19 refused to grant sanction for prosecution in the case.
Aggrieved by this, the father of the deceased boy has now sought quashing of the February 19 order under Section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) by the CBI in respect of four policemen to prosecute him in the CBI case. The sanction of the prosecution was sought. Haryana Home Secretary.
According to the petitioner, the Home Department without mechanical means and specifically passing a reasoned order to deny the offense and the offense committed by all the accused persons and without setting aside the facts, commended the facts and culpability of the crime to the police. passed without order. According to the circumstances, evidence, witnesses and documents on record presented by the CBI in the charge sheet.
It has also been argued that the charge sheet filed by the CBI prima facie substantiates the involvement of the police, yet these materials and concrete evidence are being completely ignored by the Home Department, giving the impression that they are the former. Perception and preconceived notions sat with the mind to be denied approval at any cost of material and substance.
On September 8, 2017, the body of seven-year-old “Prince” (given by name) Supreme court For the victim to hide his identity) his throat was slit inside the school toilet.
The matter was initially investigated by the Haryana Police, which had registered a case of murder of a class II student against a bus conductor of the school.
However, the matter was later handed over to the CBI for investigation. The premier agency had arrested “Bholu”, a class XI student of the same school, on charges of killing Prince.
HC Justice Arvind Singh Sangwan issued the notice after taking cognizance of a petition filed by the father of the deceased boy, seeking prosecution of these cops who wrongly refuted the theory of sexual abuse of his son. which had brought humiliation and humiliation to the victim and her family.
The petitioner has also argued that the right to peace of the deceased victim has been grossly violated by making all efforts to free the main accused and falsely implicate an innocent person.
The CBI on January 6 filed a supplementary charge sheet under sections 120B, 166A, 167, 330 and 506 of the IPC in the special CBI court in Panchkula for making false and fabricated charges against four policemen Narinder Singh Khatana, Biram Singh, Shamsher Singh. did. Subhash Chand Haryana Police.
However, Haryana’s home department The CBI had on February 19 refused to grant sanction for prosecution in the case.
Aggrieved by this, the father of the deceased boy has now sought quashing of the February 19 order under Section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) by the CBI in respect of four policemen to prosecute him in the CBI case. The sanction of the prosecution was sought. Haryana Home Secretary.
According to the petitioner, the Home Department without mechanical means and specifically passing a reasoned order to deny the offense and the offense committed by all the accused persons and without setting aside the facts, commended the facts and culpability of the crime to the police. passed without order. According to the circumstances, evidence, witnesses and documents on record presented by the CBI in the charge sheet.
It has also been argued that the charge sheet filed by the CBI prima facie substantiates the involvement of the police, yet these materials and concrete evidence are being completely ignored by the Home Department, giving the impression that they are the former. Perception and preconceived notions sat with the mind to be denied approval at any cost of material and substance.
On September 8, 2017, the body of seven-year-old “Prince” (given by name) Supreme court For the victim to hide his identity) his throat was slit inside the school toilet.
The matter was initially investigated by the Haryana Police, which had registered a case of murder of a class II student against a bus conductor of the school.
However, the matter was later handed over to the CBI for investigation. The premier agency had arrested “Bholu”, a class XI student of the same school, on charges of killing Prince.
.