Today the people of the country are asking only one question whether Nupur Sharma is responsible for the murder of Kanhaiya Lal in Udaipur? And can the Udaipur incident be justified on the ground that Mohammad Riyaz Attari and Ghaus Mohammad were hurt by the insults of Prophet Muhammad. If the answer is yes, then will the 2001 terrorist attack on Parliament also be considered correct? Will the 26/11 attack in Mumbai also be considered justified? The people of the country are asking all these questions today.
In today’s DNA, Zee News’ Rohit Ranjan analyzes the observations of the Supreme Court during the hearing on the Nupur Sharma case. The debate started after the Supreme Court’s observation that Nupur Sharma was responsible for the Udaipur incident. Nupur Sharma, in a petition in the Supreme Court, had demanded that all FIRs registered against her across the country should be shifted to one place in Delhi.
She said that she was constantly being threatened with death and rape. In such a situation, it is not possible for her to go to different states and cooperate in the police investigation and she wants that all these FIRs should be transferred to Delhi. But the Supreme Court rejected this demand of Nupur Sharma. During the hearing of this case, the Supreme Court also said some such things, which are now being debated in the country:
1. The court said that Nupur Sharma has provoked the sentiments of the people by commenting on Prophet Mohammad.
2. The court also said that Nupur Sharma is responsible for the tense situation in the country at this time. And his statement is the only reason for the unfortunate incident in Udaipur.
3. The court also asked Nupur Sharma to apologize to the whole country.
4. The court said that Nupur Sharma should have come on TV and publicly apologized for her statement, but she did not do so. And his apology was also just a formality
5. The court is annoyed that Nupur Sharma tendered a conditional apology.