Last Updated:
The area, located near the Ram temple, is known for army practice. (PTI Photo)
To shed light on the issue, Ayodhya Commissioner Gaurav Dayal provided a comprehensive overview of the regulations governing army land.
The recent debate surrounding the potential sale of army land to private builders in Ayodhya has stirred local concerns and allegations of government favouritism. This controversy has raised questions about the legality and process involved in acquiring such land.
To shed light on these issues, Ayodhya Commissioner Gaurav Dayal provided a comprehensive overview of the regulations governing army land. According to real estate experts, the acquisition of army land by private builders is a highly complex and regulated process. Army land, which is crucial for national security, cannot be sold directly to private entities. Transfers are only permitted under specific conditions and involve a lengthy approval process.
Any sale or transfer of army land requires explicit authorisation from both the Ministry of Defence and the Central Government. This process ensures that land is only allocated for projects of public interest, such as infrastructure development. If army land is to be given to a private builder, it must undergo a transparent tender process to ensure fair pricing and openness. Additionally, permissions from state and local authorities are mandatory to prevent any disruption to military operations and to manage land allocation effectively.
In a recent statement, Dayal clarified that no army or government land has been transferred to private builders in the Majha Jamthara area. This area, located near Panchkosi and 14 Kosi Parikrama Marg close to the Ram temple, is known for army practice and is used for various government schemes, including projects by Jal Nigam and Ramlala Park. Dayal confirmed that the land in question comprises government-owned Nazul land and some privately-owned parcels, but it does not permit commercial construction.
Experts in real estate emphasised that the hurdles for private builders seeking to acquire army land are significant. The legal and administrative requirements are stringent, deterring many from pursuing such transactions. Adhering to government regulations and procedural norms is crucial, making the process of acquiring army land both challenging and tightly regulated.
In conclusion, while the acquisition of army land by private builders is theoretically possible under certain conditions, it involves a rigorous and highly controlled process to ensure that national security and public interest are upheld.